Thursday, December 15, 2011

Friday, December 2, 2011

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Money Masters




THE MONEY MASTERS is a NON-FICTION, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

The banks own your government!

Herman Cain shows the rot of the Tea Party



Supporting economically ignorant Herman Cain could neuter the Tea Party movement. Actually I think this is the obvious last nail in the coffin for the now hopelessly hijacked “Tea Party” a “movement” that is now almost completely filled with ignorant brain dead Hannity and O’reilly Fox “News” propaganda (liberal as in neocon BTW).

As if you needed any more proof we need tar and feathers




Former lobbyist Jack Abramoff (who spent time in prison after pleading guilty to corrupting public officials) exposed how the U.S. government is legally corrupted. The Young Turks Cenk Uygur is a total liberal bed wetter, but as before using the “canary warning system” even the liberal delusional partizans pick a gem out of their own offal.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

The Geezer Mafia and the Ponzi scheme







 From the US government SEC website.

What is a Ponzi scheme? A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors. Ponzi scheme organizers often solicit new investors by promising to invest funds in opportunities claimed to generate high returns with little or no risk. In many Ponzi schemes, the fraudsters focus on attracting new money to make promised payments to earlier-stage investors and to use for personal expenses, instead of engaging in any legitimate investment activity.

Why do Ponzi schemes collapse? With little or no legitimate earnings, the schemes require a consistent flow of money from new investors to continue. Ponzi schemes tend to collapse when it becomes difficult to recruit new investors or when a large number of investors ask to cash out.

LFTR Thorium nuclear fuel energy




Thorium is readily available & can be turned into energy without generating transuranic wastes. Thorium's capacity as nuclear fuel was discovered during WW II, but ignored because it was unsuitable for making bombs. A liquid-fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) is the optimal approach for harvesting energy from Thorium, and has the potential to solve today's energy/climate crisis. LFTR is a type of Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (Th-MSR). This video summarizes over 6 hours worth of thorium talks given by Kirk Sorensen and other thorium technologists.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

What if the the Oligarchy Controlled You?

The what if game with the Judge... Remember government is not the source, not the control, not the power but a paid whore for the real power of the Oligarchy!

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Threat assessment team - really?

On September 12, 2011, Professor Miller posted on his office door an image of Nathan Fillion in Firefly and a line from an episode: "You don't know me, son, so let me explain this to you once: If I ever kill you, you'll be awake. You'll be facing me. And you'll be armed." On September 16, UWS Chief of Police Lisa A. Walter emailed Miller, notifying him that she had removed the poster and that "it is unacceptable to have postings such as this that refer to killing." Amazed that UWS could be so shockingly heavy-handed, Miller replied by email, "Respect liberty and respect my first amendment rights." Walter responded that "the poster can be interpreted as a threat by others and/or could cause those that view it to believe that you are willing/able to carry out actions similar to what is listed." Walter also threatened Miller with criminal charges: "If you choose to repost the article or something similar to it, it will be removed and you could face charges of disorderly conduct.” 

'Firefly' and Anti-Fascism Posters Get Professor Threatened with Criminal Charges on University of Wisconsin Campus

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

What do liberals think? “Take the guns”...

Tough talk from liberals? Don’t mistake them for liberals, but the state worshiping bullies by proxy that they are and will be.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Open Carry Talking points



All in or nothing, it is a right or a controlled regulated “privilege" - the choice is yours.

Monday, July 4, 2011

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

The college indoctrination fraud



In four five or six years easy to brainwash over-sensitive, unthinking, TV raised kids can turn into hateful worthless liberal punks.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Saturday, May 14, 2011

U.S. vs. John Bad Elk USSC decision thrown out the window

Photobucket

The Supreme Court of Indiana just ruled that in Indiana, if a police officer decides to illegally come into your house, you're not allowed to do anything to stop him. According to "Justice" Steven David, resisting an admittedly "unlawful police entry into a home" is against "public policy." Got that? If you live in Indiana, and a cop decides to invade your home without a shred of legal justification, it is considered a crime for you to do anything to stop him.

Indiana: Full Frontal Fascism

Indiana High Court Says No Right to Resist Illegal Police Entry

The Indiana Supreme Court ruled Friday that state residents have no right to resist an illegal police entry, overturning a Common Law that dates back to the English Magna Carta of 1215.
Writing for the court's 3-2 majority, Justice Steven David said if a police officer wanted to enter a home for any reason - or for no reason - homeowners could do nothing to block the officer's entry.
"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David wrote, according to the Northwest Indiana Times. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."
He said persons arrested after an illegal police entry are still entitled to post bail and can seek remedies through the legal system.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” - Samuel Adams

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Defiant Self-Reliance



Jonathan & Emily Whiting discuss the recent SNN article they co-wrote titled "Defiant Self-Reliance." They produce much of their own food as well as other things they need on their own land. They are also home-schooling parents. In this interview they relate their life-style to the struggle for freedom from a system which seeks to regulate and control us by promoting dependency. Their article can be read at:

southernnationalist.com/blog

Monday, May 9, 2011

Education as a Weapon Against Southerners (and others)



Public education is used by the Establishment to oppose Southern identity, values and culture. Education is increasingly centralised and parents and communities have less and less control. It's time that we recognised this problem and took action to ensure a better and brighter future for Southern children.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Comparison in the political false party system



The death of Osama Bin Laden is no excuse for defending George W. Bush and big government.

Anyone seriously think there is any real difference in the two parties?

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Public domain Farm and Industry

We are looking for people who are interested in building the world's first replicable open source self-sufficient decentralized permaculture village - to transcend survival and evolve to freedom.

Public domain Farm and industry plans.




Friday, April 22, 2011

Open Carry for rights



Fear the government that fears your guns?

How about distrust anyone who distrusts or disrespects your rights!

Secession, War and the Empire



Thomas Woods explores the “what if” and why of the war of the Federalist state and the States.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Why authoritarians have problems with wars

Ever wonder why the US military can’t win wars?

Why a few ragtag guerillas could send it running out of Somalia (Black Hawk Down)? Why one guy with a truck bomb could chase the Marines out of Lebanon? Why the attempt to rescue the hostages in Iran was such a disaster? Why the world’s most expensive military can’t win its unending wars against peasants with rifles? How is this possible?

The relentless affirmation of their lethality leads to underestimation of the enemy. Before you stick your hand into a hornets’ nest, it is well to examine the hornets. We don’t. The Taliban are primitive mountain-crawlers with AKs. “No problem, sir! We can take them. We’re the best equipped etc.” In an ancient war of classical antiquity, the Vietnamese were held in contempt as rice-propelled paddy maggots. No problem, sir. We’ve got fighter planes and tanks and endless zip-wowees. Everything but understanding and curiosity.



Remember when Reagan called the Mujahideen freedom-fighters?

Atlantic Seaboard Northern Elitism (Starve the Monkeys)

Give New York the finger.





How many volunteers from New York helped Tennessee?

Let them rot.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Give the finger to the “rat race"

Have you ever thought of just “pulling the cord” and dropping out?

You cannot be arrested for NOT working, non-compliance is not violent and does not have to involve handcuffs and pepper spray.

One way to put it is to “starve the monkies” as Mayberry has posted, is it a bad thing to simply “stop everything” live without the crap and even live as a poor drop-out?



How about the deliberate choice of “dropping out” planing and preparing for this as a protest?

What if you are removed from your wage-slave job, what is this is a consequence of the economy?

Over a decade ago I lost everything, job, savings, blackballed by locals and homeless with wife and children. Living in a camping trailer we not only survived we thrived and now we are happy with a more traditional “nuclear family” with a working dad and stay-at-home mom. I did not choose this event (actually a string of events) and it was a very hard and stressful time, but in the end it was the best thing to eve happen to the family and me personally. The stress is the issue, had this been foreseen I could have planned for the events and even pulled the cord myself.

What if you decide to starve the state? What if you decide to follow the famous “drop-outs” like Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or David Crocket? Not in that stupid worthless leftist statist slacktivist or the dream-catcher fire circle new-age way but a real planned deliberate effort.

Supporting an evil system is participating in the evil yourself!

Could you plan to become a non-issue and also a non-support for the state within the state - of course you can! Would your life be better if you followed your dream as an independent craftsman or working poor? Is the stress of the rat-race worth the now worthless money?

Plan now, the had of change is upon us now - or even pull the cord yourself, to plan and implement is better than forcing your plan on the fly - I can back that up with my own experience.















Thursday, April 7, 2011

Ass backward political authoritarians

In the wake of the Koran burning controversy, Sen. Lindsey Graham was quick to call for limiting free speech but never the wars we fight allegedly to protect these same freedoms.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Civilian open-carry facts

Fact: 11% of police shootings kill an innocent person - about 2% of shootings by citizens kill an innocent person.

Fact: Police firearm retention is a problem. Hundreds of firearms are missing
from the FBI alone and 449 of them have been involved in crimes.

Legal gun owners are actually members of the most law abiding citizens in the US.

Police do not get into the profession to carry a firearm. Citizens who carry, typically have an interest in firearms and protecting themselves and their family, and self-trained in ways that make them more familiar with the weapons they carry than the average police officer. 

Many propose the training and permitting of firearm carry, the moment a right is restricted to permitted owners it no longer is a right but becomes a privilege granted by the state.

Trading a right for a privilege is never a reasonable barter, that is unless such support comes from the political statist who supports removing self-protection rights.

The criminal minority sadly has set the standard by reason the statist anti-gun people use to trample on the rights of the responsible citizen. There are sadly far too many laws supposed to punish the criminal and irresponsible people that encroach on the rights of the responsible citizen.

Photobucket

Milton Friedman on the flaw of the welfare state

Professor Milton Friedman explains basic fallacies on which the welfare state has been built.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

The Rapid Simplification of Complex Societies

The collapse of complex societies of the past can inform the present on the risks of collapse. Dr. Joseph Tainter, author of the book The Collapse of Complex societies, and featured in Leonardo Dicaprio's film The Eleventh Hour, details the factors that led to the collapse of past civilizations including the Roman Empire.

This is part 1 of 5 of a keynote talk delivered to the 2010 International Conference on Sustainability: Energy, Economy, and Environment organized by Local Future nonprofit and directed by Aaron Wissner.













America's brightest minds on the fraud of the banks

They knew and they warned us, that our downfall would not be from war from the outside but from despotism fostered by the parasites in banking becoming powerful then taking the strings as puppet-masters.

Two articles to watch and follow and continue your research.

Every American who calls themselves a patriot MUST understand the evils of banking and how the fraud of fractional reserve banking - you must understand how this is used to control this country. Thomas Jefferson knew this and warned us about banking.

America's brightest historical minds speak to you about monetary reform.

Top 10 Americans for monetary reform

“Experience, more prevalent than all the logic in the world, has fully convinced us all, that it (paper money issued directly by government) has been, and is now of the greatest advantages to the country.” – Benjamin Franklin, The American Weekly Mercury, March 27, 1729.

“The utility of this currency became by time and experience so evident as never afterwards to be much disputed.” – Benjamin Franklin, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin

“All the perplexities, confusions, and distresses in America arise, not from defects in their constitution or confederation, not from a want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.” – John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson (1787-08-25), The Works of John Adams

“This institution (privately-owned central banks) is one of the most deadly hostility against the principles of our Constitution…suppose a series of untoward events should occur…an institution like this…in a critical moment might upset (overthrow) the government.” – Thomas Jefferson, December 1803 letter to Treasury Secretary, Albert Gallatin.

More here.

"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. . . . Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit."
- Sir Josiah Stamp

Self-delusion among the survivalists

I have never been comfortable with the title "survivalist", I have used it before, but you will note I used the term "preparedness" as I consider myself a student of history and politics and because of this I support "preparedness" as I am convinced that we are facing the worst crash to hit the world from the fall of the Roman Empire. I feel that we have become so interdependent that it will be dangerous and painful to return to even regional self-support.

I have seen a strange turn on the web as of late, an unusual amount of "survivalists" who have taken to removing logic and reason from their daily thinking.

They are in several sub-categories, the three main views I see are:

A. The crash is coming but it will not be that bad and big .gov will stay in full power (this is an extension of the same flawed thinking they use to support this idea).

B, People will group up but will ignore thousands of years of culture and ethnic ties.

C. Many have taken to flawed neocon thinking listening to such plants and hacks as Glen Beck, Rush, Hanity and promoting the neocon war-hawk agendas.

The A type, have an unconscious faith (in an almost religious nature) that the government is actually competent. Of course it has not been competent for generations, but it has grown larger and gained more support from the truly competent the "Industrial complexes" and the Major Media forces along with Political Action Committees supported by men of nefarious intent from universities, political/religious groups and international financial institutions.

The powers that be have overstepped their bounds and are going to fail, and to tie into group B the ethnic stress in this country will not be able to be overcome when basic services stop - the large cities will tear themselves apart.

The B type, seeped in deep political and religious backed multicultural conditioning and propaganda they fail to see that all empires fail and they all fail from the forced grouping of various multi-ethnic groups. Sadly when FORCED into multicultural high population groups ethnic and religious stress becomes a dangerous pressure cooker. What I have found traveling the world is that people are and can be quite gracious and friendly when NOT forced into cooperation but when a reward is presented such as trade and cultural exchange.

The C type, often have left-over MSM conditioning and are reverting to the FALSE right-wing hacks that are actually left-wing oligarchical supporting neocons of the Trotskyite type. Beware of this type of propaganda, it is ruinous and supportive of empire an empire doomed to fail.

The question is not if we are going to fall but WHEN the empire will fail and how bad, harbor no illusions, this will be bad adding delusion does not help.

Facts about gun carry

What the gun control groups don't tabulate is how many homicides have been averted by a licensed, concealed handgun.


Kleck, who has done extensive research on the topic, says it is "quite reasonable to expect that thousands of lives are saved by defensive gun use by persons who carried guns in public places." Even if he's wrong, it would take only a handful of such incidents to offset the homicides "caused" by concealed-carry laws.


The problem for opponents is that they have sown fear from the beginning, only to harvest a meager crop. A generation ago, few states allowed concealed-carry. When Florida captured national attention by legalizing it in 1987, critics forecast mass carnage. When other states followed suit, the same predictions were heard.


But they turned out to be false alarms. Instead of an epidemic of violence, the nation saw a drop. Since 1991, the murder rate has been cut nearly in half. You don't have to believe that "shall-issue" laws caused the decline to grasp that they certainly didn't get in the way.


The record of the past two decades demonstrates that you can strengthen the right of law-abiding adults to protect themselves against crime without making the world more dangerous.

Photobucket

Only 7 states and the District of Columbia prohibit open carry of a firearm. Most are places you would expect like New York . A couple are the states most people mistakenly think allow open carry such as Texas and Florida. That means that 43 states allow some form of open carry of a firearm.

How history kills propaganda, gun control

I have presented this before but I wanted to review the folly of using bumper sticker propaganda to promote or detract from one political agenda or the other.

All the dictators agree - gun control works... Sounds great, wonderful propaganda hot off the press to use in the promotion of an idea - sadly in one aspect we take the low ground with simplistic platitudes...

The NSDAP and gun control.

Read the real and unbiased history and be shocked if you have never seen this material.

The limited sense is that gun laws for both ethnic Germans and non-German ethnic people were greatly released as compared to the Weimar (leftist/socialist) under NSDAP. Later gun laws were to be greatly increased for non-German ethnic people (Jews, Gypsies, and some specific Church members considered "dangerous"). This makes it almost impossible to make a simple clear answer the the question - the typical American wants a simple answer, and in politics and political history a simple answer is difficult to "boil down to".

Weimar Germany's laws were the basis for the Gun Control Act of 1968 and strangely even they had to remove some restrictions from an earlier transition period.

Both the NSDAP and the Soviets depended on loyal local bureaucracies to extend power, and in many cases this translated to extreme inconsistencies in practice.

The difference is that generally the "right" is gun friendly for it's "approved groups" and the "left" is very gun restrictive, clearly Obamonation is leftist - as gun owners this will bode ILL for us.

For a critique of the JPFO argument and identification of their work as "cultural" and how you have strange bedfellows in the "pro-gun" movement... Worth the read, an accurate look at the strange bedfellows pro and con...

Critique of gun control propaganda, pro and con - PDF

"The 1928 law put into effect a strict licensing scheme that covered all
aspects of firearms—from the manufacture to the sale, including repair and
even reloading ammunition.68 It explicitly revoked the 1919 Regulations on
Weapons Ownership,69 which had banned all firearms possession, and thereby
liberalized firearms regulation. As Halbrook himself notes, based on review of
contemporaneous newspaper reports and official commentary, “the 1928 law
was seen as deregulatory to a point but enforceable, in contrast to a far more
restrictive albeit unenforceable [1919] order.”70 Halbrook continues: “Within
a decade, Germany had gone from a brutal firearms seizure policy which, in
times of unrest, entailed selective yet immediate execution for mere possession
of a firearm, to a modern, comprehensive gun control law.”71
Second, with regard to gun possession, the 1938 Nazi gun laws
represented a further liberalization of gun control regulations. In fact, most of
the changes in the law reflected a loosening of the regulations, not a tightening.
The Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, is patterned on the Law on Firearms
and Ammunition of April 12, 1928. The two laws have the same structure,
similar section headings, and broadly similar language."

"The Minister of the Interior, Frick, passed
Regulations Against Jew’s Possession of Weapons on November 11, 1938,
which effectively deprived all Jews of the right to possess firearms or other
weapons. It was a regulation prohibiting Jews from having any dangerous
weapon—not just guns. Under the regulations, Jews “are prohibited from
acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as
truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and
ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.”95
Moreover, prior to that, the German police and Nazis used the 1938 firearms
law as an excuse to disarm Jews. In Breslau, for instance, the city police chief
decreed the seizure of all firearms from Jews on the ground that “the Jewish
population ‘cannot be regarded as trustworthy’”—the language from the 1928
and 1938 firearms laws.96
It seems fair to conclude, then, that the 1938 Nazi gun law represented
a slight relaxation of gun control. Though the Nazis were intent on killing
Jews and used the gun laws to that effect, they aspired to relaxation of gun
laws for the “ordinary” or “law-abiding” German citizen, for those who were
not, in their twisted minds, “enemies of the National Socialist state."

Just not a simple or clear answer, unless you want to boil it down to - if you don't like or trust someone, make sure they don't have weapons... but that is almost too simple to be useful in anything but the bumper sticker level conversation.

Granola yuppies prove liberals and progressives have nothing

Stop with the left vs Right crap. When I ripped into Bush's policies I was accused of being a liberal. When I rip into Obama's policies which are the SAME policies I am accused of being a conservative no actually worse, a racist. Janean Garofalo Has exposed her tribalism stating that people opposing Obama only do so because he is black and they are racist. I was waiting for some liberal nut to say that. It was only a mtter of time before they tried to hide behind a race card after there is no where left to run or way to rationalized Obama's Neocons like behavior.
- Rys2sense

We live in two Americas, America the Illiterate





Two Americas

Illiterate America

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

Eighty-five percent of juveniles who come before the courts are functionally illiterate. Half the heads of households classified below the poverty line by federal standards cannot read an eighth grade book. Over one third of mothers who receive support from welfare are functionally illiterate.

Illiteracy - Major U.S. Problem

63 percent of prison inmates cannot read

The Flynn effect, how liberals lie to themselves.

IQ Bashing, Breakdancing, The Flynn Effect, and Genes

Tests of cognitive ability correlate with each other--people who do well on one test tend to do well on the others. But across generations, tests involving abstract generalizations have increased the most. Performance on tests involving memory, vocabulary, and general knowledge have hardly budged.

Note how fraudulent Gladwell presents his theories.

Could America enter a process of balkanization

Photobucket

Could we break up after a collapse? Igor Panarin a professor in Russia wrote that we would.

I think his idea has some merit, but I think he has too little information about the US and our distinct regional cultures and did not take into account geological features. He writes he expects six regional areas - I say over 16!

I travel for business, in fact I am traveling over half the year with 2 to 3 round trips each month in just about every location in the United States, Mexico, Europe, the Near and Far East. Once you work in this way it is a hard lifestyle on your health but your services become "in demand" I from time to time take the kids or the wife so they can see the country or travel internationally. I am not a "sophisticated" traveler I travel on someone's dime not my own, and I travel almost exclusively for projects and work not recreation. I try to enjoy travel, meeting new people, and seeing new places (if you don't develop this mindset you will grow bitter) and I have survived this lifestyle now for over a decade!

My gut is telling me we are about to, and it is going to get nasty, our world is not prepared for a crash of the magnitude we are about to experience.

I made the above map based on several things, culture, ethnic composition, geographical features and limitations, the freedom scale, and political considerations.

This map is only a vague guess and based on my travels, and my impression of the local cultures, I am hyper-sensitive to subtle cultural differences and because I work and travel I see the "back room" versions of the cultures and people not what a recreational traveler would see.

My impressions;

Aztlan Emprie - Mexico and the ethnic communities within the US that are primarily of Mexican ethnic make up. In the last ten years there has been a massive change in the attitude of the conglomerated ethnic enclaves in the areas where the enclaves have become extremely resistant to cultural or lingual integration into the US. At this point I am not judging this situation but rather pointing out the possible conflict under the coming collapse and how that will possibly play out under regional conflict - better to face reality now, like it or not.

Native Territory - Possibly an area of conflict where Native American ethnic groups resist the formation of Aztlan or decide to join with the Mexican ethnic split, I think there is a large chance they will resist. The geography makes this area relatively secure because of the large effort necessary to subdue the area and low return with regional resources.

New Republic of Texas - This area will come into continual conflict with the formation of Aztlan, and honestly, the native Texicans and Tejano populations are scrapping for a fight and would not look positively on the formation of Aztlan and the loss of land. I could see a loss of land from Aztlan and other surrounding areas to invasion from the new formed Republic of Texas. Many of you who do not understand Texas culture may scoff at this, but I am very familiar with this area and it would not take much to reform as a new regional country.

New South - Predominately areas with very high populations of African-Americans an area of high chances for ethnic conflict that will be long and violent and possibly responsible for very high losses in life due to formations of ethnic based conflicting groups. I think this area will be hardest to predict the final outcome - except bloody and horrific.

New Florida - Areas of high populations of non-Hispanic white populations may get squeezed in the middle of the very real possibility of heavy African-American and Hispanic ethnic conflicts in this area, boat/sailing based escapists will be the best off.

New Cuba - The Southern Florida area where large populations of Hispanics, White-Hispanics, and non-Hispanic White populations likely will form into a conglomeration of mutual support in resistance to conflict from the New South.

Ozark South - Areas of heavy white populations that are also heavily armed and willing to use them to basically defend themselves from the regional and ethnic conflicts. There is a very real possibility that they would join or work with a new formed Republic of Texas to regain large areas of Louisiana from the New South. Expect mutual conflict with Mid American Empire, Midwest Empire, and this area is likely to form mutual assistance agreements with the New Southern Republic.

The Eastern and Mid American Empire areas - Areas of the US that tend to heavy authoritarian social alignment, the areas may form assistance agreements, but the cultural differences from Midwest and Mid American areas with the Eastern and New England authoritarian cultures most likely will conflict. The two Eastern Empires will become the most troublesome to their neighbors in attempts to gain land and resources. The Eastern elitism deeply ingrained in their culture will be their downfall as they aggravate their more freedom loving regional neighbors. With heavy urban areas the internal conflicts and losses to population will be very high, the Eastern New England area will have the heaviest proportional population losses of all the areas except the southern California Metro Hell Hole.

Northern Free Territorial regions - Areas of the US and Canada that have a more rural populations with a tendency to open and free republics heavy "pioneer" attitude and resistance to authoritarian thinking. Large wild areas with resources but a harsh life with long winters will form the northern areas into lightly populated free and open areas. The first winters after a collapse will thin the population by over 60%.

The Mormon Republic - with high populations of armed and prepared religious communities the Mormon areas will be best able to capitalize on the collapse. The Mormon churches and members are not only prepared but have religious based predictions about a collapse and are ready and organized in preparation for this event. The "gentile" populations of non-mormons will be tolerated but a concentrated effort to convert them will start immediately, the overwhelming thrust may force many non-mormon members to move into other regional areas. (I am not LDS, if any of the church members have thoughts, or predictions feel free to add them - Note: I am not in any way resistant to Mormon religious freedom or anti-Mormon as I have a great respect for the church members and their proposed and promoted family morality) The heavy Mormon areas are most likely going to be the areas with the least conflict internally.

Costal Western region - Poor California, you know Northern California will LOVE to split away from it's Southern neighbors. After a long bloody struggle that could be almost totally internal. The most capable and scrappy of the armed population will rise from the ashes to join in relief with one another in a new republic. Once internal conflict is over, woe to the areas of North West Aztlan! This conflict will be almost as violent as what I expect in the South East as retribution for the expected ethnic cleansing the Aztlan Empire will levy on her new territory.

Using political Canaries as a method of information extraction

How do you know? How do you know if political information is correct?

Watch the canary in the coal mine...

How do we weed through the deliberate disinformation and outright poor conjecture and false conclusions based on bias?



There is a method of tracking small units of fighters hiding in a general population when they can not be found in their hideout.

Mark the contacts and skirmishes on a map of the area, soon a foolish small force will start to make a large ring of contacts around their base, of course a well led unit will take this into account and form artificial rings outside of their base.

Politics can be viewed the same way, for many years now a ruling elite has used deception and distraction to keep the masses uninformed of their slavery - but this elite has operated for so long that they have made several artificial rings around the true center.

So how do you find the "rings of contact" in politics...

This is where the canary analogy/allegory comes into play, as in the air testing canary in a coal mine, think of all the fringe political types as hypersensitive to intrusion a "skirmish" if you will. When you have several elements that oppose each other start to make the same connections or complain about the same government or power structure intrusions you have to "put a pin in the map" and start to look for the center of the extensive circles of contact.

I observe and read as many of the "politically incorrect" groups and individuals as possible, I find as many of the unpopular opinions and groups as possible to read, hoping to pick up on their hypersensitivity. The far left as well as the far right, along with the off-grid escapists, greens, ethnic nationalists, religious apologists, atheists, artists, scientists, and other political outsiders - they are the canary birds, hypersensitive to changes in politics.

I think I get a better idea of the general map when I do not concentrate on just one section.

Folks, the canary birds are dropping dead of the same air ALL over the place! When the radical greens agree with the Black Nationalists, along with the radical homosexual groups, AND the White Nationalists - YOU NEED TO PAY ATTENTION!!!

What can we gather, clearly there is an agenda of the elite, they have overstepped their bounds and caused possible financial ruin or have intended that outcome to further a nefarious plan - regardless things are about to happen and I do not feel like they will be able to control the outcome as well as they may have planned...

We will see if we make it out of the other side, or smile to one another and our firing squads for resisting
"I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.”
- Kurt Vonnegut

IQ and the government deliberately sabotaging education



Low intelligence has significant social effects. From "The General Intelligence Factor" by Linda S. Gottfredson (Scientific American). Original table from Intelligence, Vol. 24, No. 1; January/February 1997.

IQ by total population

IQ
<75          75-90          90-110          110-125          125+

% of total population
5%           20%             50%               20%                5%
_______________________________________________
% out of work force 1+month
22%         19%             15%               14%                10%
_______________________________________________
% unemployed 1+month
12%         10%             7%                  7%                 2%
_______________________________________________
% divorced within 5 years
21%          22%           23%                15%                 9%
_______________________________________________
% illegitimate children (women)
32%          17%           8%                   4%                  2%
_______________________________________________
% lives in poverty
30%          16%           6%                   3%                  2%
_______________________________________________
% ever incarcerated (men)
7%            7%            3%                    1%                 >1%
_______________________________________________
% chronic welfare recipients (mothers)
31%          17%           8%                   2%                 >1% 
_______________________________________________
% drop out of high school
55%          35%           6%                   >1%               >1%

_______________________________________________

And and addition not from this report, and not peer reviewed...

% religion important
85%          75%          30%                  11%                >1%


Posting the above charts should be enough to get me in the “evil right-wing oppressor" of the month category with the leftist delusional bunch.

We cannot continue to be slaves to PC thoughts that there are NO differences that can be noted scientifically in intelligence. None of us can make any strides in fixing this country if we are willing to bow to political correctness and ignore real issues.

I believe I have seen enough FACTS to point to our Government DELIBERATELY ruining the education of this country.


A PDF worth every second of the read, note this was written some time ago and it is not so clear that it is painful to read.

The Lincoln myths

From: THOMAS DILORENZO

President-elect Barack Obama's historic journey to his swearing-in was underway when he hopped on a train in Philadelphia. As a tribute to President Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president, who led the nation through the Civil War and ended slavery in the United States, Barack Obama traveled the same train route on a whistle-stop tour of 70 cities when he was inaugurated in 1861.

There is a good reason why the Lincoln legend has taken on such mythical proportions: Much of what Americans think they know about Abraham Lincoln is in fact a myth. Let's consider a few of the more prominent ones.



Myth #1: Lincoln invaded the South to free the slaves.

Ending slavery and racial injustice is not why the North invaded.

As Lincoln wrote to Horace Greeley on Aug. 22, 1862: "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it"

Congress announced to the world on July 22, 1861, that the purpose of the war was not "interfering with the rights or established institutions of those states" (i.e., slavery), but to preserve the Union "with the rights of the several states unimpaired." At the time of Fort Sumter (April 12, 1861) only the seven states of the deep South had seceded. There were more slaves in the Union than out of it, and Lincoln had no plans to free any of them.

The North invaded to regain lost federal tax revenue by keeping the Union intact by force of arms. In his First Inaugural Lincoln promised to invade any state that failed to collect "the duties and imposts," and he kept his promise. On April 19, 1861, the reason Lincoln gave for his naval blockade of the Southern ports was that "the collection of the revenue cannot be effectually executed" in the states that had seceded.

Myth #2: Lincoln's war saved the Union.

The war may have saved the Union geographically, but it destroyed it philosophically by destroying its voluntary nature. In the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, the states described themselves as "free and independent." They delegated certain powers to the federal government they had created as their agent but retained sovereignty for themselves.

This was widely understood in the North as well as the South in 1861. As the Brooklyn Daily Eagle editorialized on Nov. 13, 1860, the Union "depends for its continuance on the free consent and will of the sovereign people of each state, and when that consent and will is withdrawn on either part, their Union is gone." The New York Journal of Commerce concurred, writing on Jan. 12, 1861, that a coerced Union changes the nature of government from "a voluntary one, in which the people are sovereigns, to a despotism where one part of the people are slaves." The majority of Northern newspapers agreed.

Myth #3: Lincoln championed equality and natural rights.

His words and, more important, his actions, repudiate this myth.

"I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races," he announced in his Aug. 21, 1858, debate with Stephen Douglas. "I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position." And, "Free them [slaves] and make them politically and socially our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this. We cannot, then, make them equals."

In Springfield, Ill., on July 17, 1858, Lincoln said, "What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races." On Sept. 18, 1858, in Charleston, Ill., he said: "I will to the very last stand by the law of this state, which forbids the marrying of white people with Negroes."

Lincoln supported the Illinois Constitution, which prohibited the emigration of black people into the state, and he also supported the Illinois Black Codes, which deprived the small number of free blacks in the state any semblance of citizenship. He strongly supported the Fugitive Slave Act, which compelled Northern states to capture runaway slaves and return them to their owners. In his First Inaugural he pledged his support of a proposed constitutional amendment that had just passed the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives that would have prohibited the federal government from ever having the power "to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State." In his First Inaugural Lincoln advocated making this amendment "express and irrevocable."

Lincoln was also a lifelong advocate of "colonization" or shipping all black people to Africa, Central America, Haiti--anywhere but here. "I cannot make it better known than it already is," he stated in a Dec. 1, 1862, Message to Congress, "that I strongly favor colonization." To Lincoln, blacks could be "equal," but not in the United States.

Myth #4: Lincoln was a defender of the Constitution.

Quite the contrary: Generations of historians have labeled Lincoln a "dictator." "Dictatorship played a decisive role in the North's successful effort to maintain the Union by force of arms," wrote Clinton Rossiter in "Constitutional Dictatorship." And, "Lincoln's amazing disregard for the Constitution was considered by nobody as legal."

James G. Randall documented Lincoln's assault on the Constitution in "Constitutional Problems Under Lincoln." Lincoln unconstitutionally suspended the writ of habeas corpus and had the military arrest tens of thousands of Northern political opponents, including dozens of newspaper editors and owners. Some 300 newspapers were shut down and all telegraph communication was censored. Northern elections were rigged; Democratic voters were intimidated by federal soldiers; hundreds of New York City draft protesters were gunned down by federal troops; West Virginia was unconstitutionally carved out of Virginia; and the most outspoken member of the Democratic Party opposition, Congressman Clement L. Vallandigham of Ohio, was deported. Duly elected members of the Maryland legislature were imprisoned, as was the mayor of Baltimore and Congressman Henry May. The border states were systematically disarmed in violation of the Second Amendment and private property was confiscated. Lincoln's apologists say he had "to destroy the Constitution in order to save it."

Myth #5: Lincoln was a "great humanitarian" who had "malice toward none." 

This is inconsistent with the fact that Lincoln micromanaged the waging of war on civilians, including the burning of entire towns populated only by civilians; massive looting and plundering; rape; and the execution of civilians (See Mark Grimsley, "The Hard Hand of War"). Pro-Lincoln historian Lee Kennett wrote in "Marching Through Georgia" that, had the Confederates somehow won, they would have been justified in "stringing up President Lincoln and the entire Union high command" as war criminals.

Myth #6: War was necessary to end slavery.

During the 19th century, dozens of countries, including the British and Spanish empires, ended slavery peacefully through compensated emancipation. Among such countries were Argentina, Colombia, Chile, all of Central America, Mexico, Bolivia, Uruguay, the French and Danish colonies, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela. (Lincoln did propose compensated emancipation for the border states, but coupled his proposal with deportation of any freed slaves. He failed to see it through, however). Only in America was war associated with emancipation.

In sum, the power of the state ultimately rests upon a series of myths about the alleged munificence of our rulers. Nothing serves this purpose better than the Lincoln myth. This should be kept in mind by all who visit the new Lincoln statue in Richmond.


THOMAS DILORENZO is the author of "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War" and a professor of economics at Loyola College in Baltimore.

The Southern Avenger presents a short subject film.



When South Carolina NAACP President Lonnie Randolph criticized Obama recently, comparing the president honoring Confederate soldiers at Arlington Cemetery on Memorial Day to paying tribute to Adolph Hitler, it was worth pointing out how Abraham Lincoln was much more similar to the Nazi dictator than Southern soldiers fighting for their country's independence.

Cassandra effect and Social Security

You need to understand this is not about saying anyone does not deserve what they pay into, but to talk about how YOU have had your money STOLEN and you need to understand what is about to happen!

If you expect retirement or Social Security - YOU NEED TO MAKE PLANS NOW, it will not be there for you and you need to understand it was stolen from you, please remember who you can "thank" for this when the time comes.

The coming disaster - Social Security is going to disappear as more reach retirement than can support this SOCIALIST plan.

This is all much deeper than anyone is wanting to come to terms with...

We also have to come to terms with the fact that many of the most productive in the country will be retiring soon leaving a smaller section of productive people and millions of Illegals hungry for a smaller amount of money produced by the not-yet retired.

A statistical disaster is about to happen, and that is the massive retirement of the "baby-boomers" leaving much smaller populations of productive workers to cover larger proportions of retired people.

Our economy will not handle what is about to happen... and our government seems to be intent on driving us faster into the pit.

Our mistake would be in thinking that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid were ever good ideas or that they were ever Constitutional...

If a private company or individual started a pyramid scam like Social Security they would end up in prison for most of their adult lives, but whorish and evil politicians such as FDR are even called "great" for their treason.

I don't begrudge any reaching retirement your thoughts that you deserve you money back,
but you have to understand your parents, my parents, and all of us were TRICKED.

We were TRICKED into thinking this was all a good idea and told it was acceptable or even Constitutional - it was not and is not.

If you are of retirement age you most likely will see the end of Social Security, I KNOW I will never see a penny of it and I am PLANNING for this problem. I know I cannot "get out" of that
"voluntary" system, so I am not begrudging the retirement aged the money the government has stolen from all the taxpayers to keep a valuable and large voting block happy, it is all everyone for himself after all!

It is theft, it will always be theft, and it will continue to be an issue for this country.

I am not saying that someone who has worked their lives does not deserve a retirement they paid into - what I am saying is that is was THEFT and redistribution and was wrong from the beginning.

I am also saying that anyone on retirement NOW that will likely live long enough to see the next ten years will continue to see less and less of that VALUE (as the money will be worth less and less) and most likely will see the END of that system - you should be prepared to re-enter the workforce when this Social Security system collapses.

The simple fact is that there are LOTS of baby-boomers about to reach retirement who will by simple large numbers will stress the Social Security system to the point it will break. I don't begrudge the money that was stolen from them either but I recognize that it will break the
system and likely break the country.

It was a ponzi scam from the beginning, doomed to fail.

I for one do not want to see my children and grandchildren robbed of their money to pay for some ponzi scam. It needed to be fixed a long time ago but because the whores in politics are also cowards they never wanted to make that large voting block mad....

Because none were willing to face the problem it has only grown larger and will continue to grow larger until it fails catastrophically.

I would like my generation (40s-50s) to put it's foot down and dig in and fix this problem, but as long as we have people continue to say "I want mine" it will continue to grow larger and more dangerous. I think I deserve it myself, I look at how much they have pulled out and think, "I want that back" but I understand that looking at this with emotion and a sense of entitlement will only make the end run worse. I am even willing to continue to have it stolen from me and KNOW I will never see it as long as they stop the system NOW and take that burden off the following generations.

What IS the answer - I'm not sure, one could be to consolidate and grandfather then cut the system off... I do know if nothing is done it WILL fail. As we continue to have big business send work offshore and hire illegal workers there will be no BASE to draw funds from to support the
system.

It is close, and it will be huge - get ready.

This can be an emotional issue, don't let that take away from the looming factual problems that will have to be dealt with.

This and other issues have become such an emotional issue none are willing to look at it objectively.

The truth is this county flirted with Socialism and allowed the Social Security system to be set up in the first place, FDR lied when he said the new currency was not fiat currency, and lied about Social Security it was our biggest early experiment with socialism and it is about to fail.

They were tricked, we were tricked, and most of the people in the US were tricked and NONE of us likes to admit that we were duped and that makes it an emotional issue.

The FACTS are that it WILL fail - do we want to put our heads in the sand and have it fall on our backs or do we want to recognize what will happen?

I am willing to CONTINUE TO PAY - even KNOWING that I will never see a SINGLE penny! I just want it to end, I am willing to pay for the bad decisions of the past as long as it DOES NOT pass on for more generations. But I do not think we will survive as a country that long, we are already doomed, we already cannot handle more of the big problems and we have a long list waiting to hit us.

I would like it to change before it becomes a problem - what happens when we have a large amount of baby-boomers who DEPEND on Social Security and HAVE NO OTHER OPTION and find themselves with a bankrupt system and NO INCOME...

I'm not begrudging anyone who paid in and then expects some back - like I said, I would like some of that back myself - but I am willing to give it up to end the system - a system that CANNOT survive - it is one of the reasons that a ponzi scam is ILLEGAL - it ALWAYS WILL FAIL.

The system WILL fail - prepare NOW, this is not an issue of "blame this or blame that" but a simple issue of warning and fixing - if we cannot fix it we need to spread the warning that it WILL FAIL, I want us all to be ready for what is about to happen...

What happens on a fixed income and the TRILLIONS of dollars of fiat money is finally released by the banks and starts a new round of excessive inflation? That hammer is about to fall and I can guarantee that the government will NOT bring the fixed amounts up to compensate.

I hear lots of "I worked my ass off and my money was given to your grandparents - YOU owe me. You talk about patriotism and freedom like you almost know what it is all about."

First, I DO NOT owe YOU a damned thin dime. I never forced anyone to pay into a ponzi fraud, I am at least rational enough to understand you are being irrational. Second, I understand the disappointment more than you think, and I do understand patriotism, and a lot more about the Constitution and freedom than most of the typical Americans expecting their entitlements. (Far too many whiny Baby Boomers who seem to want to blame the "youth" for everything, you were the ones who vote in your own slavery... what nerve)

I am NOT disparaging anyones life of work or what they paid in taxes (think rational and logical you know the truth) I am only making the obvious conclusion - the political WHORES sold you and this country's future a long time ago! It is called fraud and you and I were taken for suckers and fleeced.

"But I get a statement from Social Security that tells me how much I will get, that is like a contract, a statement of account they have to honor"

This of course all assumes that the government has any honor and is any better than Bernie Madoff - they are not and never will be. How incompetent is the government? Have you not figured this out? Doesn't this problem just take the cake? Madoff gave out monthly statements also... we all know how that worked out.

When could we ever trust the government to be honest and honorable?

Yes, we were all forced to contribute, yes the government would rather waste money on ill advised endeavors, like buying votes with welfare and amnesty, yes they lied us into socialism.... But they are incompetent and they always were, we gave the keys to the bank to a bunch of drunken losers at the bar and we get this, a wreck of a country, the fault is not with the youth or your "selfish" neighbors but with your past voting - you made this bed now we all have to lie in it.

I would say my point is always hate, fear, and distrust the government, and understand they have no intent to help you but to help the ones who have the real power. Bail-outs, so who was behind that? Why was it so important that Bush the younger got on TV and told everyone that we needed to hand BANKERS our money or the country would be ruined - and what happened? Record PROFITS for the banks on our tax dollars.

The government did not "find the money" for the bailout - it is debt, crushing debt, on the backs of our grandchildren! They paid for the handouts for their masters with the debt slavery of our grandchildren! If the American people should be mad enough to start the second revolution - the first was for LESS - how the Founders must be turning in their graves!.

We could quote the Founding Fathers on this issue because they KNEW what was going to happen when the creeping forces of banking and intrigue would take over, and the need to keep out of "foreign entanglements" like Vietnam and now Iraq and Afghanistan... Ask yourself the simple question "who benefits?" - you know the answer deep down.

What do we do? They lied and they are broke and many who should be able to retire on money they were promised will not get it or it will stop when they need it...

How do we prepare for this? I would be willing to continue to pay Social Security and never see a penny - as long as it stops with my generation, I get the feeling I am alone in this - the desire to fix it at any cost and at any price, because it will continue to be a broken system and I want to fix it now before it gets worse.

The reality is WHEN does government EVER keep a promise unless it means votes or more cash into their whorish pockets.

A link from the mouth of the beast (US .Gov).

Johnson during Vietnam needed some money to continue at that point some government accounting shenanigans were uses to "cook the books" to help with the higher debt the government wanted to continue to buy the "guns and butter" - until the bailout, this was the largest in US history - a redistribution scheme.

"In 1983 Congress changed the law by specifically authorizing the taxation of Social Security benefits." Remember that - so who was in charge?

What this SSA.gov sight points out is how much FDR LIED to the people to get us into socialism and how the .gov continues to TRICK us to take our money and make sure it ends up in the International Banks (the Fed).

This is only one part of a HUGE system designed to remove money from the Americans pockets and transfer it into the pockets of the political whores and their masters.

If only more people understood how evil our banking system is and how intertwined the MSM, .gov, and the Fed were it would scare the pants off of them - they operate a confidence game and the history of banking is a history of fraud. It doesn't matter what they admit to in public, if less than one per cent research it and understand the few who recite it are ridiculed.

"If governments should refran from regulation ...the worthlessness of the money becomes apparent and the fraud upon the public can be concealed no longer."- The Econiomic consequences of The Peace, by John Maynard Keynes (1920) - One of the most evil men in banking and government control I can think of, and most don't even know who this devil was.

Social Security was ALWAYS a ponzi scheme and it is about to FAIL.

I understand the Cassandra effect - I see it more than I would like - but I will not let it censor what is important...

I am trying to point out the looming problems that we need to address - personally I don't think we can fix them, only warn our fellow Americans of what is about to happen - evil men in government and banking put us in this position and I am convinced that it was a clear plan... get ready.