Thugs, guns, and racism

What is more deserving of skepticism than the propaganda of the established media conglomerates and the oligarchy controlled government itself. Many of course do not understand this letting apathy and even narcissism give them a security blanket from whence to lash out in irrational an illogical patterns far too common today. One of the issues is a particular tool, a very dangerous tool, a machine actually called the firearm for the uninformed that is commonly called a “gun.”

Before we get into the story that prompted the title we can review a short video clip.


I guess you can always pick the wrong coffee house... run thugs, run!

Crime and Self-Defense:

Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms.

A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard.”

Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders. Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun.

Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.

A 1994 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that Americans use guns to frighten away intruders who are breaking into their homes about 498,000 times per year.

A 1982 survey of male felons in 11 state prisons dispersed across the U.S. found:

34% had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim” 40% had decided not to commit a crime because they "knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun” 69% personally knew other criminals who had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim”

And of course one item worth noting for its misuse in established media propaganda.

"In homes with guns, the homicide of a household member is almost 3 times more likely to occur than in homes without guns.”

This statistic is based on a three-county study comparing households in which a homicide occurred to demographically similar households in which a homicide did not occur. After controlling for several variables, the study found that gun ownership was associated with a 2.7 times increase in the odds of homicide.

This study does have a few flaws:

Ownership is not a random decision, homicide victims may well possess firearms precisely because they are likely to be victimized, live in an area considered dangerous or crime ridden, or have received direct threats.

Often cited that states with high firearm homicide numbers prove that the prevalence of guns is the deciding factor often fail to cite that many states with the highest gun ownership also have the lowest firearm homicide numbers. Poverty, education, and issues (including politically incorrect facts) show stronger correlation to violent crime numbers.

The results are arrived at by subjecting the raw data to statistical analyses instead of letting the data speak for itself. (For reference, the raw data of this study shows that households in which a homicide occurred had a firearm ownership rate of 45% as compared to 36% for non-homicide households. Also, households in which a homicide occurred were twice as likely have a household member who was previously arrested (53% vs. 23%), five times more likely to have a household member who used illicit drugs (31% vs. 6%), and five times more likely to have a household member who was previously hit or hurt during a fight in the home (32% vs. 6%).)

What I find most interesting as of late is the irrational and illogical equating of deaths by accident (negligent discharge) and the deliberate use of a firearm to prevent a crime and somehow the restraint of the typical victim does not count because most criminals are not killed in the process of a victim defending themselves.

In the end no reason, no statistics, and no emotional projection can change the fact that the firearm is a dangerous tool, legal adult ownership of any firearm comes with great responsibility, freedom is not and never has been safe and firearms remain deadly tools.

On to our subject - thugs, guns, and racism, and yes I am using the word thug, where you see that the insertion is mine...

The victim: The Denver DA drags man into system drains his money and spits him out when nothing is found (standard for Denver except for the wild police that are out of control) The local media and ethnic communities join together and use racism and deliberate exposure to drive out a good individual that wanted none of the trouble.

The established media: The typically liberal media of Denver whines about a thug killed in a robbery attempt and promotes interviews with tearful relatives.

It starts with the title - Make My Day Shooter: ‘I Did The Right Thing’

The genuflection to the criminal and his family is sickening.

The robbery:

“I’m yelling ‘Who’s in my house? Who’s in my house?’ I was scared,” said Kutchin (homeowner victim).

Suddenly, the three teens came running down from the second floor. Marcus Duran (Thug) was carrying a loaded pistol. As he neared the front door, about five feet away from Kutchin, Duran brandished the loaded gun and aimed it at the homeowner. Duran (Thug) was still inside Kutchin’s home.

“And I just reacted in a defensive stance and took a shot,” said Kutchin. The round missed its target. Kutchin said he could see Duran’s pistol. “I saw a gun pointed at me and I shot,” said Kutchin.

The second round hit Duran in the head. The two other teens fled (now in jail for related robberies). Also be aware the rounds fired from the victim’s revolver are shot-shells and a single round will fire multiple projectiles (from 3 to 50 depending on size of the shot).

The toxicology report for Marcus Duran (Thug) shows the teen tested positive for alcohol, opiates and THC- the active ingredient in marijuana.

“My Godson did wrong, but he didn’t deserve to die,” said Phyllis Chavez, Duran’s godmother.

“I don’t think it was fair the way he(Kutchin) shot freely. Do it in the air. Why was he aiming at them if they are running away? That’s the part I don’t understand,” said Chavez.

You should see some of the comments both pro and con. Look Phyllis your godson entered two homes that night with intent on criminal activity. Duran was armed and he fell under a second round fired so in effect a “warning shot” was fired first as the victim missed with the first shot-shell fired. Duran raised his pistol (an illegal pistol BTW, and illegal for him, a minor, to posses - so much for gun control) and the homeowner/victim was forced to kill this criminal.

It is not the fault of the victim that your relative was a criminal, you would rather he be in prison or free after he killed this homeowner? (somehow I bet that is the case.)

Kutchin said beyond the anguish over what happened, he has spent $5,000 on attorneys fees, another $1,000 on his insurance deductible and countless hours dealing with police, prosecutors and court personnel.

The Denver District Attorney’s office cleared Kutchin of any criminal wrongdoing, ruling his actions were justified under Colorado law. But that is not the end of the story.

Channel 31/Channel 2 crew members visited the house in question. They found the 3150 Gaylord Street residence boarded up, and neighbors told them the owner had left after reportedly receiving threats. The racism: In the end the homeowner is driven out of his own home by racist hispanics more interested in lauding a teen criminal than facing the reality of the case. I can assure you that if anything had been wrong or if Denver had been able to plant evidence, or force a wrongful prosecution you better believe that the DA in this area would have sacrificed the homeowner for political gain, clearly he was not able to railroad this individual.

Some additions:

Armed self defense works

As I’ve noted before, criminals often work in groups, using superior numbers to overwhelm their victims. When that happens, even the strongest unarmed victims can be overpowered by the numerically superior criminals.

Whining morons bitch about a criminal lost, "Make My Day" case or unjustifiable homicide?

In the end this is simple - break into a home at 2 am in the morning and you have a gun with you you then threaten someone with, you have written your own death warrant, I have no sympathy for stupidity, excuses, or age, the world is better now that a criminal’s career was cut off permanently.

Personal rights and freedom, the open carry movement

Of course you get the load of crap from the anti-gunners here is an example.



And an additional example.

Asshole you should be arrested, how dare you go out in public and disturb the peace of sane people. You are looking for trouble and you know it you jerk. I hope you cross paths with a cop that understands you are a dangerous retard and executes you on the street like the dog you are. How many times do crazy people like you walking around with guns hurt people or shoot cops?

Fist, I have to say the statist above is why I censor responses, they are all hit and run completely uninterested in having a logical debate.

If you do want a logical debate, and I have yet an anti-gunner that I have not had tuck tail and run in imbarrassment, I welcome that chance...

So let's answer the ninny’s question.

How many open-carry advocates have killed a police officer - exactly ZERO.

Gun owners in general and OC in particualr are statistically the most law-abiding and peaceful bunch you would ever run in to - unlike the wretched statists like the deluded poster of the above.

There are at least 400 deaths per year by police abuse, and negligent accident (about) 800,000 LEOs in the US or 1 in 4000, US population 307,006,550 (U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, nice and official for you) so 306206550 non-LEO - Firearm homicides 12632 plus 700 = 13332  so 1 in 22,967 not bad.

But let's go deeper,

305886550

When we take out the disabled Americans.
223886550

Take out all under 20 years old.
186886550

Adults of retirement removed.
1 in 14017

That gives us a number 3.5 times the amount of police buggery over citizens heavily biased as we are counting all civilian accidents and all civilian firearm homicide.

Shouldn’t we demand a higher standard for a sworn and trained individual.

The ignorance of a control and confiscation advocates

It always helps to add more skepticism of the propaganda of the established media, and the consistent spew from ignorant firearm control and confiscation supporters. For me the worst part about having to see or listen to the typical firearm control and confiscation supporter’s illogical screeching is not the endless irrational whining but the utter delusion and complete ignorance of the subject.

Yes it is the ignorance, it has to be the most irritating part of listening to the political whores and the useless indoctrinated morons on the internet that continue to support firearm control/confiscation and then prove a vacuous blind ignorance. The overwhelming desire to ask "would you please stop the regurgitated Bullshit and at least try and read something factual or historical about some of the items you are blathering about?"

I can only guess the ignorance of the statist confiscation supporters would be embarrassing, except the major trait of an ignorant delusional vacuous narcissist is an inability to recognize that self delusion. Some of the best are when one of the ignorant zombies dredges up the old canard "You just want to be like Rambo" when in fact the gun industry and the "gun culture" within the US uses "Rambo" as a pejorative to replace Walter Mitty.



The above video is a laugh riot, below is a play-by-play.

1. Designed to allow "spray fire" from the hip? None of the firearms on her little poster are designed to "fire from the hip.” The only thing close to the ridiculous Hollywood “spray from the hip” is the low sling position first introduced by the US army for use with the .30 Browning Automatic Rifle for suppressive fire, this is not "spray from the hip" but an aimed by adjustment field tactic developed for fire and maneuver advancement. A typical hood-rat would not even understand the application. The .30 Browning Automatic Rifle would not even make the "assault weapon" list due to lack of features but does fire an extremely powerful cartridge.

This person is unable to even give an accurate account of her terminology, nor does she have a grasp of a shred of the history at the root of the nonsense word she uses. The Assault Rifle or Sturmgewehr "storm/assault rifle” is a real word and has a real definition and is the base for this propaganda twaddle. The established media propaganda producers were able to capitalize on the ignorance of the general public sadly weened on stupid movies containing evil-looking or "tacti-cool" props with massive special effects applied in compositing/Foley. Honestly the made-up nonsense word "assault weapon" is a politically-motivated pejorative that has recently morphed into "High powered assault weapon" among the super ignorant and whorish firearm control/confiscation batch like Schumer and Feinstein.

2. The larger companies of the established firearms industry until the last few years refused to even enter into the catalogs of products any weapon that resembled anything the control/confiscation types wanted to call an "assault weapon". The demand was from the buyers not the marketing. Many small, quick to react companies started production to fill the demand, the larger companies did not and paid the price for that decision, some continue to pay a price.

3. Bullets from an "assault weapon" are no different than any from any other type of gun in the same caliber, all rifle bullets will penetrate both sides (and the person in the center) of a typical "bullet proof vest" like a hot knife in butter. Most "assault weapons" fire cartridges that are low-power or underpowered by full sized rifle standards.

4. The "assault weapon" poses no additional threat to the typical LEO than any other firearm, in fact real data on the use of "assault weapons" against police show that less than 5% of all crimes against police (numbers are similarly low for the general public) with a firearm include an "assault weapon." The bogus figure of one in five police who are killed with a firearm are killed with an "assault weapon" is without a doubt a lie, a falsehood that will not withstand even the first few pages of research.

5. This babbling idiot wants to talk about the "spirit of the law” - a law that had no real basis in reality. The "assault weapons ban" was actually written by someone from within the gun industry (Bill Ruger) in an attempt to save his failing sales by eliminating his competition. Bill Ruger's dirty secret, the NRA paid cover-up.

The law was based on what a firearm "looked like" and its attachments not the true function. So again we see the ignorant following the whores. One of the provisions of the "Assault weapons ban" was "A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm” in effect all of them are "copy-cats” and that was the basis of this ridiculous law.

6. The velocity of the bullets? You want to ask her "are you delusional?” To this day the .30-06 is the most popular rifle round in the US, I know of no rifle that would fit even her idea of an "assault weapon” that can fire this large full sized rifle cartridge. The .30-06 can be fired with a bullet double the weight and can have double the powder charge that can fit into the most popular assault rifle cartridge. .30-06 is a truly deadly round specifically designed to kill large game, it towers above the intermediate cartridges of the assault rifle - lady you are just delusional and embarrassingly ignorant.

7. Designed to allow "spray fire" - Jesus, Mary, and Joseph what a fuckwit (see #1).

8. The "evil black gun" is attractive to "mass murderers," ugh, can we be honest here? Most of the crimes now called mass murdering sprees were connected to mental problems. I have seen some indication that most or all of the well known murdering events were committed by individuals under the prescription of anti-depressant drugs. We have also been lucky the crimes used as propaganda by the established media were not committed with a simple shotgun, the deaths would be double or triple.

I want to return to the part about ignorance I think the following video about sums up the typical ignorance. It provides perfect example of just what you can expect from the typical political whore.



Criminals do use tools to frighten victims, the firearm is a particularly deadly tool that can be used in the trade of thievery, robbery, and in the hands of the insane or predatory it is frightening.

So what do we see in crime? The top 10 guns used in crimes are predominantly small, inexpensive, easy to operate and conceal handguns, the only "long gun" to make the list is the effective and extremely deadly pump shotgun.

The actual list of most criminally used firearms:

1. Smith and Wesson .38 revolver
2. Ruger 9 mm semiautomatic
3. Lorcin Engineering .380 semiautomatic
4. Raven Arms .25 semiautomatic
5. Mossberg 12 gauge shotgun
6. Smith and Wesson 9mm semiautomatic
7. Smith and Wesson .357 revolver
8. Bryco Arms 9mm semiautomatic
9. Bryco Arms .380 semiautomatic
10. Davis Industries .380 semiautomatic

None of the pistols or the shotgun would make it to the “assault weapons” list and only the S&W and Ruger have magazines that would hold more than ten rounds.

None on the list have a barrel shroud, bayonet lug, magazine outside of the grip, grenade launcher, or flash hider...

For a humorous rundown of the list try this site.

Responsible people and reasonable gun regulation

I cannot tell you how many times I see liberal/progressive indoctrinated nitwits say something like this:

No one is even suggesting that we want to make the ownership of guns illegal...
You penis compensating gun nuts seem to think responsible people are out to take your shotguns and rifles at the mere suggestion of reasonable gun regulation.

Well jackass it is because we KNOW you are lying you slimy statist bootlicker!

Notice how every anti-gun politically wet hippy feminized twit wants to frame the pie-hole spew as - you are the gun nut, you are unreasonable, you are taking this all out of proportion.

Could it possibly be because we know, have seen and can use google to search the websites of all of the anti-gun groups? Look scumbags we are not now and have not been that stupid, your pathetic self-centered ego driven narcissism is showing.

If you can stomach the nausiating drivel from Ed Schultz (washed up football fucktard turned media whore) you can see just how pathetic and cowardly Ed Schultz actually is (for more proof google video of Ed Schultz and how he interviewed Ron Paul and then what the cowardly fuckwit would say when Ron was not able to defend himself).

Sensible and Reasonable Gun Control?

You know what I am getting slightly ill by now, I cannot even look at this woman for more than a few seconds now...



Note the sensible and reasonable BS - and that "terrorist watch list" is a fraud, hey lady, ever seen all the news stories about the kids on the list, but its our government and they can never make a mistake. I have a better one, how about firing all the cops who have "domestic violence" records? Civilians you say cannot be trusted with guns and "domestic violence" will prevent you from buying a gun nationwide, how about police with "domestic violence" records, should they still be allowed to carry guns? Why the exception for the statist thugs?



Ugh, now she wants licenses and gun registration, and yes we have auto registration and driving licenses and we were tricked into that un-Constitutional crap also, where does it take us? Do you want to have to pay for a license and a fee for every gun you own every year? Think about how much it cost you to register your car every year, now tell me this will turn out well.



This is not an issue of politics and "sensible laws" it is an issue of RIGHTS and the Constitution, but I far too many of you eastern elitists to expect you to understand, your goal is to rule and have the rest of us shut-up and live under your enlightened guidance, F-you.



Oh boy.

You cannot make a statist think, enjoy the crash you ninnies.

Urbanite idiots talk about guns and hunting

From the category you can’t make this up three idiots talk about hunting and guns, one almost sounds reasonable but was obviously ruined when moving to the Atlantic Seaboard.



I have made the point before that I think most male anti-firearm and anti-hunting males are bully-by-proxy inadequates. Men who feel some guilt for a lack of competence, confidence and experience. Most of them are hopelessly ignorant and stupid.